The best hack to be productive

Summary: To do more in less time, spend more time doing less. 

The summary is not a paradoxical statement. Given how busy everyone’s life has become and how being busy brings social prestige, to do more in less time people have to multi-task. But multi-tasking is the enemy of getting stuff done and the thief that steals our happiness.

Elizabeth Dunn, a psychologist at the University of British Columbia, told The Economist, “Multi-tasking is what makes us feel pressed for time. No matter what people are doing, people feel better when they are focused on that activity.”

When you feel better doing what you do, you get more stuff done and walk away happier. So if Dunn is right, it is better to do one thing at a time, which may inevitably mean spending more time doing less but still getting more done.

Some of the best friends I made at Oxford are those that are part of the Oxford Ideas Group. Our similar interests brought us close and they keep us close despite going down very different career paths.

One of those common interests was to find hacks to become more productive: to do more in less time. The “more” was not just for greater quantity but also for better quality. So after a few years of real-life experience, when two members of the group arrive at the same idea about productivity, there must be some “truth” to the revelation. For instance, Christo recently wrote that his “new secret for having more time” was to do less. My new year resolution is to gain more time by doing fewer things with greater focus.

This is a post in the best hack series, where the aim is to find small ideas that have a big impact in improving everyday life.

Image credit: ryantron under CC-BY-ND.

Why Dhoni’s decision to retire from Test cricket was right for him and for India

The announcement of Dhoni’s retirement from Test cricket has been a shock to many. As one of the most experienced cricketers in the Indian team and only 33 years old, many expected him to be around for longer. And yet, from what little we know about MSD, this decision would not have been made on a whim. He would have deliberated over it and then chosen the time when it felt right.

The post-announcement analyses have given us some plausible explanations. Dhoni got India to the top of the Test rankings (albeit for a brief period), but his Test leadership wasn’t as great as that in the shorter format of the game. He played in 90 tests and was a highly respected captain, but he could see how India’s overseas Test performance was consistently poor despite his efforts. He perhaps saw in Kohli—even though their personalities are poles apart—more hope than he saw in himself.

Kohli’s captaincy in the first Test can be criticised, but there is no doubt that it was the most entertaining Test so far in Australia. With eight months of no more Test cricket for India, Dhoni leaving now would give the Indian team time to regroup without him and think about how to improve.

So there are honourable reasons for Dhoni to leave now, but the analyses missed a grander point. If Dhoni was worried about not captaining well enough, he could have just given up the captaincy and stayed on as a wicket-keeper. After all, India doesn’t have a better Test keeper than him. But he didn’t; he retired from the format completely.

Here’s why: Test cricket isn’t what it used to be. Sure there are fans who revere this format more than any other, but that base has shrunk. Thanks to franchise cricket, such as the Indian Premier League, the shorter formats of the game enjoy more crowds, more money and thus more fame. The return on effort invested is far greater in those formats than in Test cricket.

I have immense respect for Dhoni, and I place him on a high moral pedestal. In a wonderful profile, Mark Nicholas wrote: “Dhoni is a thoughtful and intelligent person. He is driven by a deep morality.”

But a moral decision alone wouldn’t have brought the Test retirement this early. I reckon his decision involved the sharp perspective of a businessman. He is after all one of the richest sportspersons in the world.

That though should not be seen with contempt. His decision might not be in the best interests of the Indian team in the short-term. However, I feel it might do the team a service in the long-term.

Image credit: movingahead under CC-BY-NC-SA.

Curious Bends – Warren Anderson, handheld malaria detectors, ancient Indian science and more

1. Warren Anderson, who faced one of history’s worst industrial disasters, is dead

“After he became chairman and chief executive in 1982, he improved productivity and sales, and acquired several companies, including STP Oil. Ecologists said Union Carbide began shaking off the reputation as a polluter that had long dogged it. Mr. Anderson ruled over an empire with 700 plants in more than three dozen countries. Then came Bhopal. For the first time in his life, Mr. Anderson couldn’t sleep; at one point he holed up for a week at a hotel in Stamford, Conn. He and his wife, Lillian, spent evenings reading newspaper articles about the tragedy to each other. When they went to restaurants, he was afraid to be seen laughing because people “might not think it was appropriate,” he told The Times.” (5 min read, The New York Times)

2. A handheld device that detects malaria in 30 minutes

““The algorithms we have developed run on a smartphone-like platform and do this evaluation automatically. It doesn’t require the intervention of a skilled technician. While the qualitative test results can be known instantaneously, quantitative parasitemia levels are assessed and displayed in about 30 minutes,” said Gorthi. The scientists also believe that this portable handheld device can be modified for diagnosing other diseases as well.” (3 min read, LiveMint)

3. Modern food retailing has struggled to win customers from India’s old-fashioned merchants

“In large part it is because supermarkets are not a compelling draw in terms of price and service. Most shoppers in India buy dairy products, vegetables and fruit either daily or every two to three days, and the traditional trade has a lock on these frequent purchases, according to research by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Its hold weakens a bit (and the appeal of supermarkets correspondingly tightens) on rich consumers and for less regular purchases: packaged foods; soaps, detergents and other groceries; and staples, such as rice and grains (see chart). But in general even affluent consumers prefer traditional stores, because they are closer to home, are usually open longer and offer credit to familiar customers. Many will deliver free of charge.” (6 min read, The Economist)

4. The Prime Minister and early Indian science

“Mr Modi’s claims are an inversion of the logic of faith; he is asserting that the supernatural, in this case the elephant-headed god, Ganesh, is not an instance of divine magic but the consequence of human technology. He is, if you like, offering us a secular explanation for a deity in the Hindu pantheon. If this is a reasonable characterization of his claims, then the closest parallel to the Prime Minister’s thinking is to be found not in the religious beliefs of other political figures, but in the speculative theories of Erich von Daniken. Von Daniken was an enormously successful Swiss writer in the 60s and 70s who wrote a series of best-selling books based on a single conceit: the idea that the artefacts of ancient civilisation were littered with signs that pre-historical human societies were raised from their primitive state by intelligent extraterrestrials” (7 min read, NDTV)

5. For ‘Clean India’ to work, the country needs to solve its waste disposal problem

“In addition, Delhi’s four landfill sites extend over 164 acres, when the current requirement is nearly four times the available area – 650 acres, according to a 2011 report by the Central Pollution Control Board. “Even if people learn to dump their garbage at the dhalaos [a small garbage dump typically servicing a few streets of a neighbourhood], how will that help if thedhalaos can’t be emptied, since there are barely any space left in landfills,” Narain asked.” (4 min read, Scroll.in)

Chart of the week

“The death penalty divides public opinion in America and has mostly ended in Europe. But around the world, the number of places that carry out capital punishment and the number of people killed is rising. Executions took place in 22 countries last year, according to Amnesty International, a human-rights lobby. In America there were 39 executions—more than the known number of executions in Yemen, Sudan or Somalia. Countries whose gallows had been left unused for long periods put prisoners to death, notably Indonesia (for the first time in four years), Kuwait (in six years) and Nigeria (in seven years).” The Economist has more.

Countries which carried out the death penalty in 2013