On half-baked thoughts

I recently claimed that my blog posts always have a point to make, however trivial. Ironically, I did that in a blog post that I wrote without knowing what the ‘point’ of that blog post. I knew while I was writing it that there were lots of thoughts in my head that needed to be put down. Surprisingly, even though I started without a conclusion in my head, I reached one while writing the post.

What is surprising, though, is that I felt much more satisfied after having finished that blog post than I would normally feel for a blog post that I knew had a point to make. (I may be hinting at the fact that because I made a choice to write a blog post without a goal, it gave me more satisfaction). But given this realisation, I feel it is worth exploring this kind of writing a little more.

In Praise of Half-baked Thoughts

One of my main arguments for blogging has been that it gives space to people to share half-baked thoughts and half-formed ideas. When sharing, they get an opportunity to explore their thoughts and may be in the process they are able to ‘fully bake’ those thoughts. If not, it allows for a serendipitous discovery to happen. There may be readers who may have the other half of that brilliant idea you just shared on your blog.

Ribbonfarm, a fairly popular blog written by Venkatesh Rao, is a good example of a blog where lots of half-baked ideas are shared. He usually writes long 2000+ word blog posts and many times the blog posts are a compilation of the multiple thoughts he has about that topic. He usually has a point to make but he writes in a manner where the point he makes hardly matters. He gives his readers so many interesting half-formed ideas that even if you don’t read the whole blog post whatever time you spent reading seems worth it.

In The Pipeline, one of the most popular blogs about drug discovery written by Derek Lowe, recently completed 10 years. The success of Lowe’s blog is not just from the niche that he has created for himself in the blogging world but also because of a rare distinction that it has earned as ‘one of (the blogs with) the highest signal-to-noise ratios in the entire world of blog comments’. He considers the many comments he gets on his blog as ‘rivers of gold’ and indeed they are because his readers are ready to explore the half-baked ideas that Lowe shares with them.

In his 10th anniversary blog post, he writes, “I compose quickly, and type quickly, which helps keep blogging from becoming a chore. It really doesn’t add much time to sit down and write up something about what I’ve been reading and thinking. It helps, in fact, to clarify my thoughts – I’m sure that I retain a lot more information for having blogged about it.” Here, I think, he is hinting at being able to confidently publish ideas even if he hasn’t quite got a grasp on them. He uses writing as the medium to understand it better and try to retain what he has been thinking.

Why fear then?

I realised that sharing half-baked ideas can be intimidating. We are acutely tuned to judge ourselves before others can. And, of course, if some ideas don’t even make complete sense to us then, surely, sharing them in public can only make things worse, right?

Well, not really. Consider these two blog posts, here and here. Both the blog posts have more than the usual number of comments my blog posts get. But one is a blog post where people have only commented to appreciate the writing and the other one is where people have commented to express their thoughts on what I wrote. Of course, both kinds of blog posts make me happy and proud but the one with others thoughts gives me more satisfaction – I get new ideas to write about, I am called out on things that aren’t clear to me, I am faced with opposing views, and with all that I grow.

Hopefully, my half-baked thoughts don't look this unappealing

If half-baked thoughts can start a dialogue, sharing them becomes worth it. Of course, this is not an argument for putting forth thoughts without having put in the effort to explore the thoughts. Even if it’s an incomplete idea, it is important to make your case to your readers as clearly as possible (which I’ve done here, hopefully!).

And in the spirit of the idea of sharing incomplete ideas, I am going to leave you with these half-baked thoughts. I hope you will share what you think about it and, together, maybe we can grow.

The Blaming Fallacy

How many of these have you given yourself?

How many times have we looked back at a relatively short period of time (weeks or months) and realized all the things we did wrong and blamed ourselves for not doing better? I’ve done it many times and every time I’ve felt either miserable or angry.

What’s the point in this reflection then? We make mistakes and we should learn from them so as to not make them again. That’s fine if it stops at that. But more often than not it does not stop at that. After mulling over the lessons learnt, we start blaming ourselves for making those mistakes. That just ruins all the effort put in to contemplation.

It’s great to have the ability to rush through all that data from the past and cherry-pick the data which shows us that we were wrong. We have made great progress because of this ability but when we take the next step of blaming ourselves for those mistakes we miss the point of the exercise.

We make mistakes and sometimes the mistakes we make were unavoidable given the circumstances. Looking back, of course, it might not seem so because we have a lot more data to answer the same question. Nevertheless, it is true many more times than we convince ourselves.

The world is complex and me saying it a million times is not going to be enough to convince your heuristic-ridden brains. To be able to deal with all the complexity our brain depends on shortcuts that it has created based on our past experiences. These heuristics, as they are called, are usually very useful but they also lead to the creation of biases. These biases lead us sometimes to underestimate the complexity of the world and blame ourselves for things we might not really be responsible.

Of course, playing the ‘world is complex’ card too many times can not only be futile but also harmful. It’s a card to be played when the exercise of finding our faults isn’t being helpful, when the self-criticism is stopping us from growing.

Related: The importance of differentiating between mistakes and failures.

Mistakes and Failures: Why it’s important to differentiate

How many times have we looked back at a relatively short period of time (weeks or months) and realized all the things we wronged/failed at and then blamed ourselves for not doing better? I’ve done it many times and every time I’ve felt either miserable or angry.

We often don’t spend the time in differentiating between failures and mistakes and in treating them both as mistakes we lead ourselves on to the path of misery. Seth Godin explains the difference well:

A failure is a project that doesn’t work, an initiative that teaches you something at the same time the outcome doesn’t move you directly closer to your goal.

A mistake is either a failure repeated, doing something for the second time when you should have known better, or a misguided attempt (because of carelessness, selfishness or hubris) that hindsight reminds you is worth avoiding.

Failure is good because there is a lesson at the end of it. We fail and we should learn from those failures so as to not fail again. But when we treat our failures as mistakes, we also inevitably make the mistake of blaming ourselves for all those mistakes. That just ruins all the effort put in to contemplation.

It’s great to have the ability to rush through all that data from the past and cherry-pick that which shows us where we went wrong. We have made great progress because of this ability but only when we’ve also been successful at differentiating failures and mistakes.

(As a side – what makes it hard to do this differentiation is that looking back, of course, we have a lot more data to answer the same questions. A failure might seem like a mistake when it wasn’t at the time.)

No one likes failing or making mistakes but it is definitely easier to deal with the prior than the latter.