Three messages for India’s green future

On Nov. 29, my book Climate Capitalism won the business book of the year award at the fifth Green Literature Festival. Here’s my acceptance speech:

Thank you to the organizers of the Green Literature Festival and to the jury of judges for this award. I’m really pleased to receive it and sad that I can’t be there in person with you.

I’d like to take this opportunity to leave you with three messages. They are linked to the three factors that I lay down in Climate Capitalism that are necessary for success in fighting climate change: people, policy and technology.

Let me start with technology, because it’s perhaps the easiest. The vast majority of the emissions problem can be tackled with two steps: electrify as much of the economy as possible and decarbonize electricity. Most of the technologies that India needs to get itself on track to take these two steps now exist, which is more than the solar story I was able to capture in the book through the work that ReNew has done.

Second is policy. When we talk about policy in India, the first thing that comes to mind is that India has to tackle basic issues like corruption, lack of professionalism and votebank politics, before it can turn its policy into effective outcomes. And, yet, India has shown that when it is strategic – geopolitically and economically – then it can make policy work. 

That happened in the case of solar through SECI, the Solar Energy Corporation of India. Most recently, India is attempting to do something similar with its rare-earth magnets manufacturing program. For a resource poor country like ours, good policy can make a huge difference despite its many governance challenges.

Third and this is the most important one: people. I grew up in Nashik in Maharashtra, but have spent my adult life since the age of 21 in the UK, the country that is seen as a global climate leader. That’s the case not because it’s a rich country, just look at the US, Canada or Australia – they are not classed as climate leaders. But it happened because there was enough political will among citizens, academics and politicians to have a progressive outlook on climate change.

It is also now the country that is seeing a fracturing of the climate consensus with people feeling the pinch of recent years of inflation. Opportunistic politicians are trying to blame it on climate policies without good reasons. We’ll see if they succeed, but the lesson is clear: if a rich country’s citizens whose basic needs have been met can’t be convinced to care about climate change… something that will certainly impact their lives, what hope do we have in India, a poor country where we are far from meeting basic human needs?

The answer lies in people. Over the past decade, as I’ve covered climate issues around the world, I’ve seen more and more people be engaged with the topic. Not just in cursory ways, such as reading a news story and feeling outraged, but in deep ways, such as dedicating their careers to tackle this problem. This Green Literature Festival is a case in point and I’m so glad to see it’s been going since 2021.

India has no choice but to tackle climate change. India is among the world’s top 10 countries ranked by vulnerability to climate change. It’s the most populous country in the world, which means when the impacts occur we will also see among the greatest damages caused to humans. 

So it’s down to people like you to ensure that citizens of India can see why it’s in their benefit to act on climate change and why they must vote in the politicians who understand the urgency to act and why they must choose to do business with firms that are green.

This call for people power might feel particularly hard right now. At a time when citizens barely have a voice against visible air pollution. How can we start to tackle invisible carbon dioxide pollution? Well, that’s the hard challenge we face today and it’s a worthy challenge because the solutions needed to deal with carbon dioxide are often also the solutions that will help people breathe cleaner air pollution, eat more nutritious food, build stronger communities, reduce poverty and create an economy fit for the 21st century. The task is clear and the benefits are immense.

Thank you!

Villagers armed with smartphones can help stem the rising rate of suicides in India

The stigma attached to mental illnesses is hurting India. Few are brave to speak about it to someone and fewer still get treated. The result is that, for every 100,000 Indians between 15 and 29 years old, 36 commit suicide annually—the highest rate among the youth in the world.

Worse still, according to Vikram Patel, professor of mental health at the London School of Tropical Hygiene and Medicine and one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2015, without urgent improvement in treating mental disorders, suicides will soon become the leading cause of death among the young.

Read more on Quartz. Also published in Lokmat Times.

Image credit: cgiarclimate under CC-BY-NC-SA license.

Glorifying the past is just a way of avoiding today’s grave problems

History beat out Marathi, marginally, as my least favourite subject at school. I would have loved history textbooks if I were allowed to read them like novels. But, no, we were made to mug up facts. Battle of Plassey took place on 23 June, 1757. The University of Oxford received its Royal Charter on June 26, 1214. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated on 28 June, 1914 … and so on the facts kept coming in thick packets and without time to digest.

And I kept asking, “What’s the point of studying history?” But never got a satisfactory answer till my teenage hormones had been supplanted by adult maturity. When I did get one, I could finally lay to rest all the unjust curses various historical figures had to bear because they committed historically important acts on bizarre dates and under twisted circumstances.

The real value of history is not, as most think, in “teaching” us to avoid mistakes made in the past. For history is never repeated and no two years are ever alike, how much ever writers would love to draw parallels. Adam Gopnik of the New Yorker contends that not studying history would commit humanity to the trouble of “presentism”, where we might exaggerate “our present problems out of all proportion to those that have previously existed”. Thus believing that “things are much worse than they have ever been”.

Making history do our bidding

In India, the exact opposite happens. Historical facts are misinterpreted or, worse, made up and turned into jingoistic propaganda. Instead of worrying about the troubles we face today, we proudly boast about our historical achievements and claim that independent India’s potential is no different.

When talking about the country’s achievements, our leaders like to skip the period when conquerors pillaged and the British ruled, and look at the “golden past”. A time when, they believe, India’s wealth in the world was unparalleled and our achievements unprecedented.

Because a lot of Indian kings of that supposed golden era were no benevolent dictators, these leaders choose to talk about our intellectual achievements, especially those in science. You must have heard from respectable people about how we had invented planes that could fly to Mars and back, how plastic surgery was used to stitch an elephant’s head on a human, and how we made medicine to bring the dead back to life.

“This effort of creating a false history of science in India is a spectacularly bad example of the absurd lengths to which attempts at glorification of our past can go,” said leading scientist Roddam Narasimha in an editorial in Current Science.

If Gopnik’s worry for the West about not studying history is suffering from presentism, then Indians need to worry about suffering from pastism. Our perception of our past is blocking us from working on the grave problems we face today.

And we find ourselves in this position because of two reasons. First, we have not invested enough in studying the history of science in India. Second, we ignore the voices of the few scholars who have uncovered at least some of the true history of science in India.

In 2009, the Indian National Science Academy celebrated 50 years since the conception of the history of science programme. In an article that year, AK Bag, editor of the Indian Journal of History of Science, said that despite the programme’s efforts only about 40 source manuscripts have been thoroughly studied, leaving more than 100 such documents untouched in oriental libraries.

To be sure, there have been some remarkable achievements made by ancient Indian science. These include the first recorded use of plastic surgery to heal broken noses, the development and application of many key theorems in algebra, and even correctly predicting the motions of the solar system (centuries ahead of the Greeks). And, as we scour source documents, more are bound to be revealed. But that is no reason to make up fantastical notions of what our ancestors achieved.

This kind of behaviour may come about because, according to Narasimha, we do not have reliable history-of-science books for the masses. Without the right facts, teachers suffer, education is incomplete and it is easy to manipulate public perception. “Somebody needs to write such books,” Narasimha concluded.

First published in Lokmat Times. Image from Wikipedia. This post was corrected to attribute the Current Science quote to Narasimha.